Blog

Archive for the ‘Financing’ Category

Tax credit demise threatens closings

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

WASHINGTON – June 29, 2010 – According to the National Association of Realtors® (NAR), up to 180,000 homebuyers will lose their federal homebuyer tax credit through no fault of their own if Congress fails to pass an extension by June 30 when the closing deadline expires.

Included in that number are thousands of homebuyers in every state of the union, from 390 in Wyoming to 17,700 in California, according to estimates by NAR. In Florida, 14,830 homebuyers could lose the tax credit if closings are delayed.

“These are not buyers who just entered into the market. These are buyers who previously met all the qualifications for the tax credit, but find themselves at the mercy of a workflow jam with lenders or other delays such as lapses in the National Flood Insurance Program, Rural Housing Service, and new home construction, and might not be able to complete the purchase of their homes by the current deadline,” said Golder. “It would be a tragedy for them not to be able to complete the purchase in time to claim the credit.”

NAR issued the following state-by-state estimate of the number of home sales that would be delayed beyond the June 30 deadline; numbers are rounded to the nearest 10:

Alabama, 2,590
Alaska, 830
Arizona, 5,440
Arkansas, 2,090
California, 17,700
Colorado, 3,390
Connecticut, 1,770
Delaware, 400
District of Columbia, 300
Florida, 14,830
Georgia, 6,270
Hawaii, 710
Idaho, 1,270
Illinois, 7,030
Indiana, 3,560
Iowa, 2, 030
Kansas, 1,840
Kentucky, 2,540
Louisiana, 1,800
Maine, 840
Maryland, 2,630
Massachusetts, 3,930
Michigan, 6,470
Minnesota, 3,760
Mississippi, 1,530
Missouri, 3,600
Montana, 760
Nebraska, 1,110
Nevada, 3,800
New Hampshire, 690
New Jersey, 4,300
New Mexico, 1,160
New York, 9,190
North Carolina, 4,890
North Dakota, 460
Ohio, 8,510
Oklahoma, 2,760
Oregon, 2,090
Pennsylvania, 5,830
Rhode Island, 500
South Carolina, 2,460
South Dakota, 500
Tennessee, 3,910
Texas, 15,340
Utah, 1,130
Vermont, 400
Virginia, 3,890
Washington, 3,190
West Virginia, 940
Wisconsin, 2,690
Wyoming, 390

© 2010 Florida Realtors®

Mortgage rates at lowest point since at least 1971

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

Mortgage rates fell this week to the lowest level on records dating to 1971, giving consumers added incentive to lock in low payments for home purchases and refinanced loans.

The average rate for 30-year fixed loans sank to 4.69 percent, from 4.75 percent last week, mortgage company Freddie Mac said Thursday.

That’s the lowest point since Freddie Mac began tracking rates in April 1971. The previous record of 4.71 percent was set in December. Rates for 15-year and five-year mortgages also hit lows.

Mortgage rates have fallen over the past two months as nervous investors have shifted money into the safety of Treasury bonds. The demand for Treasurys has caused Treasury yields to fall. And mortgage rates tend to track the yields on long-term Treasurys.

Yet the falling rates have yet to spark a homebuying boom – or energize the economy. New-home sales collapsed in May after homebuying tax credits expired. The economy also remains under pressure from high unemployment. And many people don’t qualify under tightened lending rules.

Rates on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages fell to an average of 4.13 percent. That was the lowest on records dating to September 1991. It was down from 4.2 percent a week earlier.

Rates on five-year adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 3.84 percent, down from 3.89 percent a week earlier. That was also the lowest on Freddie Mac’s records, which date back to January 2005 for such loans.

Average rates on one-year adjustable-rate mortgages fell to 3.77 percent from 3.82 percent. That was the lowest average since May 2004.

You have more time to close to get tax credit..until Sept 30th

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Wednesday approved a plan to give homebuyers an extra three months to finish qualifying for federal tax incentives that boosted home sales this spring.

The move by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would give buyers until Sept. 30 to complete their purchases and qualify for tax credits of up to $8,000. Under the current terms, buyers had until April 30 to get a signed sales contract and until June 30 to complete the sale.

The proposal, approved by a 60-37 vote, would only allow people who already have signed contracts to finish at the later date. About 180,000 homebuyers who already signed purchase agreements would otherwise miss the deadline.

The Realtors group has been pushing hard in Congress for the extension. Mortgage lenders, the trade group says, have been swamped with borrowers trying to get approved by the end of the month. Many potential borrowers are unlikely to make the deadline.

“If Congress fails to act promptly, then prospective homebuyers might not get the benefit of the homebuyer tax credit, even though they have completed contracts,” the Realtors said a a letter to lawmakers.

First-time buyers were eligible for a tax credit of up to $8,000. Current owners who bought and moved into another home could qualify for a credit of up to $6,500.

Lawmakers consider home tax credit extension

Friday, June 11th, 2010

WASHINGTON – June 11, 2010 – Homebuyers may get an extra three months to finish qualifying for federal tax incentives that boosted home sales this spring.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Thursday he wants to give buyers until Sept. 30 to complete their purchases and qualify for tax credits of up to $8,000. Under the current terms, buyers had until April 30 to get a signed sales contract and until June 30 to complete the sale.

The proposal would only allow people who already have signed contracts to finish at the later date. The National Association of Realtors estimates that about 180,000 homebuyers who already signed purchase agreements are likely to miss the deadline.

Reid introduced the proposal as an amendment to a bill that would extend jobless benefits through the end of November. Joining him were Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., and Christopher Dodd, D-Conn. The Senate is expected to take up the amendment next week.

The Realtors group has been pushing hard in Congress for the extension. Mortgage lenders, the trade group says, have been swamped with borrowers trying to get approved by the end of the month. Many potential borrowers are unlikely to make the deadline.

“Time is of the essence,” said Lucien Salvant, a spokesman for the group. “It’s important for Congress to get this done, because there’s whole bunch of loans that aren’t going to close on time.”

First-time buyers were eligible for a tax credit of up to $8,000. Current owners who bought and moved into another home could qualify for a credit of up to $6,500.

Help arrives for second mortgages

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

The Obama administration’s initiative to help homeowners obtain modifications of second mortgages is getting off the ground.

Just this month, Bank of America became the first major lender in the program to send letters offering modifications to home-equity loan customers struggling with their loans.

Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo joined the program in March, when updated guidelines were issued by the government.

Those banks hold about half of the USA’s second liens.

The program, originally introduced in August, is aimed at overcoming an impediment to permanent modifications of first mortgages.

Holders of first mortgages have been reluctant to take losses unless the holder of the second-lien mortgage does, too. More borrowers are staying current on their second mortgages, however, which has made those lenders less inclined to take losses.

The government’s second-mortgage program, called 2MP, offers incentives to borrowers, mortgage servicers and investors to modify second mortgages. How it works:

• When a borrower’s first loan is modified under the federal program, known as the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), and the servicer of the second loan is also a participant in HAMP, that servicer must offer to modify the borrower’s second lien.

• Servicers can stretch the term of the second loan to 40 years.

• Second-lien lenders must defer the payment of the same proportion of principal that was deferred or forgiven on the first loan.

The second loans also must have originated on or before Jan. 1, 2009, to be eligible for a modification.

Modifying a mortgage with a second lien can be more difficult because of the additional parties involved.

A second lien may be held by another servicer or investor, and getting all parties to agree on interest rate reductions or other steps to ease borrowers’ monthly payments can be time-consuming or difficult. The government program aims to make the process easier.

The number of homeowners who will get assistance is limited.

While the program is expected to reach up to 1.5 million homeowners who are struggling to afford their mortgage payments, there are an estimated 19 million residential junior liens, with an average balance of $57,000 as of January, according to First American CoreLogic.

Up to 50 percent of at-risk mortgages have second liens, according to the Treasury Department.

Even with the incentives the government is offering mortgage lenders to modify second mortgages, they could still prove to be an obstacle as pressure grows to reduce borrowers’ loan principal.

Copyright © 2010 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc., Stephanie Armour.

Mortgage rates on the rise!

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

The average rate on a 30-year loan has jumped from about 5 percent to more than 5.3 percent in just the past week. As mortgages get more expensive, more would-be homeowners are priced out of the market – a threat to the fragile recovery in the housing market.

And if you wanted to refinance at a super-low rate, you may have missed your chance. Mortgages under 4 percent are still available, but only for loans that reset in five or seven years, probably to higher rates.

Rates are going up because of the improving economy and the end of a government push to make mortgages cheaper.

For people putting their homes on the market this spring, rising rates may actually be a good thing. Buyers are racing to complete their purchases and lock in something decent before rates go even higher.

It’s all about affordability. For every 1-percentage point rise in rates, 300,000 to 400,000 would-be buyers are priced out of the market in a given year, according to the National Association of Realtors.

The rule of thumb is that every 1-percentage point increase in mortgage rates reduces a buyer’s purchasing power by about 10 percent.

For example, taking out a 30-year mortgage for $300,000 at a rate of 5 percent will cost you about $1,600 a month, not including taxes and insurance. But the same monthly payment at a rate of 6 percent will only get you a loan of $270,000.

Good economic news is the first reason rates are rising: U.S. government debt, a safe haven during the recession, is losing its appeal as investors turn to stocks and riskier corporate bonds.

Lower demand for debt means the government has to offer a better interest rate to sell its bonds. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note, which is closely tracked by mortgage rates, hovered above 4 percent this week, the highest since June, before falling back slightly.

The second reason is the Federal Reserve. Last week, the Fed ended its program to push mortgage rates down by buying up mortgage-backed securities. When demand from the central bank was high, rates plummeted to about 4.7 percent for much of last year. And business boomed for mortgage lenders as homeowners raced to refinance out of adjustable-rate mortgages and into fixed loans.

As of Wednesday, the Mortgage Bankers Association put the national average for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at 5.31 percent. One week ago, it was 5.04 percent.

Many analysts forecast rates will rise as high as 6 percent by early next year. If they go much higher, the already shaky housing recovery could stall. And that could slow the broader economic rebound.

In a normal market, with home prices steadily rising, a jump in rates doesn’t cause a big dip in demand. That’s because people know their homes will eventually rise in value, and are willing to accept a higher mortgage payment.

But now home prices are flat nationally and still falling in some places. Potential buyers are nervous about jumping in.

For people who bought their first home in the 1980s, when rates stayed over 10 percent for several years, paying 6 percent for a home loan may seem like a steal. But it’s coming as a shock to many first-time homebuyers this spring.

Copyright © USA TODAY 2010, David J. Lynch. Adrian Sainz reported from Miami.

Do new home-appraisal rules help?

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

More homebuyers will soon find that their mortgage broker can’t select an appraiser, part of a federal effort to ensure that appraisers aren’t pressured to inflate home values.

Effective Feb. 15, mortgage brokers will no longer be able to order appraisals on loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). For consumers, that is supposed to mean home appraisals will more closely reflect a home’s value. The reason: Brokers who may profit from a loan being approved won’t also be choosing appraisers, who may feel pressured to declare a higher value.

But organizations such as the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and the Appraisal Institute say the change, along with other efforts to reform the appraisal industry, is hurting consumers and appraisers. They say new rules that swept through the appraisal industry in 2009 – rules designed to ensure appraisals are impartial – are resulting in excessively low home values, because chosen appraisers aren’t as experienced or as familiar with local markets. They also say the appraisers take more time, causing delays in getting appraisals done.

“The appraisal must be completely independent of the lending side, but there are extensive time delays,” says Joe Ventrone, vice president for regulatory and industry affairs with NAR. “The values that come back are lower. A $300,000 house might come back (appraised) at $200,000.”

A changed business

The changes began in May when Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae adopted a code designed to separate loan officers from the hiring of appraisers. Since Freddie and Fannie account for nine-tenths of new home loan originations, it reshaped the business.

The code means brokers, Realtors and loan-production staff – anyone who stands to earn a commission based on the value of the transaction – can’t hire an appraiser. Instead, lenders are turning to third-party appraisal management companies that typically hire appraisers on contract to do the job.

The Title/Appraisal Vendor Management Association (TAVMA), the trade association of the real estate settlement services industry, says the third-party firms have well-qualified appraisers to do the job. They also say if appraisal values come in low, it’s only because home prices have fallen due to the market.

But some trade groups say that appraisal management companies are providing appraisers – often from outside the market where the house is located – who are less qualified than independent appraisers that brokers and Realtors might choose. The National Association of Realtors says a member survey found almost 70 percent saying appraisal times had risen by more than eight days under the new rules.

Rob Oryl, an independent appraiser in Collingswood, N.J., says he is seeing it happen. “I know a great appraiser with a staff who had been in the business for years who now just works out of his home,” Oryl says. “It’s driving people out.”

© Copyright 2010 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.; Stephanie Armour.

USDA mortgage program runs out of money

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

WASHINGTON – March 31, 2010 – A no-down/low downpayment program for rural areas is running out of operational money, jeopardizing sales in some Fla. areas.

 Last week, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced that funding authority for its popular Rural Housing 502 Single-Family Loan Guarantee program would, according to its notice, “likely be exhausted by the end of April 2010.” Once the funding runs out, the USDA will not issue its conditional commitments to homebuyers “subject to receipt of appropriated funds.”

Officially, new appropriated funds don’t become available until October 2010, but the National Association of Realtors® sent letters to Congressional appropriators urging immediate extension of commitment authority for the program. Other real estate interests, such as the National Association of Builders, have also stepped up pressure on Congress.

In a letter sent to every Florida Congressional lawmaker, Florida Realtors® President Wendell Davis told Senators and Representatives that “worthy homebuyers will be left without access to mortgages” from federal inaction. In the letter, Davis protested the lack of funding for Section 502 rural housing and Congress’ failure to extend the National Flood Insurance Program.

“Homeowners and homebuyers in our state/region are already feeling the impact,” Davis said in his letter. “Given the many challenges financial and real estate markets are facing, now is not the time to create another obstacle to real estate transactions.”

However, Congress is now in recess and does not return until April 12, so additional funding cannot appear until at least then. In addition, an increase in funding is not assured for the rural housing program, and homebuyers counting on the loan could be out of luck – especially those homebuyers hoping to use a USDA loan in time to qualify by the April 30 deadline for the federal tax credit of up to $8,000 for first-time buyers and $6,500 for move-up buyers.

Loans are first-come, first-served. With 1,900 lenders offering the loans, time is of the essence for homebuyers who plan to use the funding. When the money runs out, the program stops operations.

Questions should be directed to USDA’s Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Division at (202) 720-1452.

Fannie to ease condo mortgage restrictions?

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

WASHINGTON – Jan. 8, 2010 – Fannie Mae announced yesterday that it would comprehensively review hundreds of condominium projects in Florida. Through a new “Special Approval” designation, Fannie hopes to streamline mortgage approvals for projects that don’t currently fit Fannie Mae guidelines even though they present limited risk to the company.

Florida Realtors strongly urged Fannie Mae to revisit its lending program in the condo market, and it consulted a number of Florida Realtors as it developed the program, including Florida Realtors® Vice President Summer Greene, regional manager with Prudential Florida 1st Realty in Fort Lauderdale.

“This is good news for Florida and a step in the right direction for the state’s condominium market,” Greene says. “Hopefully, with the special approval designation process, we can begin to get our condo inventories reduced and absorbed as more condo buyers receive a green light from lenders for loans. This will help boost confidence in the market.”

Fannie Mae and its cousin, Freddie Mac, back more than half of all U.S. mortgages. As the Fannie Mae initiative develops and gains momentum, Greene hopes it provides incentive for Freddie Mac to follow suit.

While Fannie Mae currently has boilerplate guidelines for approving condo loans, it will sometimes grant a mortgage to a non-conforming condo if requested by a lender. The Special Approval designation takes that a step further by approving exceptions before a lender request has been submitted.

A dedicated team of six Fannie Mae professionals based in Florida will now examine statewide condominium projects that may not currently meet Fannie Mae’s standard eligibility criteria and assessing specific criteria more closely. The team will look at a condo project’s occupancy level, association dues, financial stability and property condition. If a project is deemed sufficiently stable following a closer examination, it will be granted the Special Approval designation, freeing lenders to originate and deliver mortgage loans secured by Fannie Mae. Projects deemed eligible will be listed on www.eFannieMae.com, and qualified borrowers will be eligible for financing.

“NAR applauds Fannie Mae for taking this important step to make condo loans more readily available in Florida,” says Moe Veissi, National Association of Realtors® first vice president and broker-owner of Veissi & Associates Inc. in Miami. “Our state is probably the hardest-hit as far as the condo market is concerned, and Fannie Mae’s new effort to take a closer look at project eligibility could go a long way to putting projects back on a healthy financial track.”

A Special Approval designation will be effective for a period between 9 and 18 months, and lenders must confirm a project’s Special Approval designation on the date of the loan application. The Special Approval initiative applies to established condominium projects only.

© 2010 Florida Realtors®

FHA and USDA Financing

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

FHA Loans:

FHA loans have been helping people become homeowners since 1934. How do they do it? The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) – which is part of HUD insures the loan, so the lender can offer a better deal.

- Here are some key features and benefits about this program:

Eligible with Fixed Rate Loan Programs (15, 20, 25 and 30yr Terms) AND 1YR, 3/1 & 5/1 ARM’s

1. Margin: 1YR – 2.25%, 3/1 and 5/1 – 1.75%; Caps: 1/5; Index: CMT

2. 1 Year ARM must qualify at 1% above the Note Rate

Maximum Financing up to 96.5% of the Appraised LTV

Minimum Down Payment Requirement = 3.5% and it can be Gifted from a Friend or Family Member

Maximum 6% Seller Contributions Allowed

Eligible for Primary Residences (1-4 Unit) Only

Purchases, Rate/Term and Cash-Out Refinance Transactions Eligible

All Purchase Transactions Minimum FICO = 620

Full Doc Option Only

Maximum Loan Amount for 1Unit = $353,750 (effective April 28, 2009 in Orange, Osceola and Lake Counties…let me know if you need limits for any other counties and/or units)

2Months PITI (Principle, Interest, Taxes and Insurance) Cash Reserves Required

No Minimum Contribution from the Borrower’s Own Funds Required

1.5-2% (Depending on Loan Approval) PMI Required Up Front which may be Financed into the Loan

Website for more info on specific State guidelines: http://www.hud.gov/buying/loans.cfm

USDA Rural Housing Loans:

The Guaranteed Rural Housing (GRH) Loan Program is a Government insured single-family home loan program for low-to-moderate income borrowers looking to purchase a home in a rural development area.  This program is an excellent option to offer borrowers who aren’t able to make a significant down payment on a home.  It is an affordable way to achieve the dream of home ownership.

- Here are some key features and benefits about this program:

Eligible with Fixed Rate Loan Programs Only (30yr Terms)

Maximum Financing up to 100% of the Appraised LTV

Maximum 6% Seller Contributions Allowed

Eligible for Primary Residences (1 Unit) Only

Purchases and Guaranteed Rural Housing Rate/Term Refinance Transactions Eligible

Full Doc Option Only

Maximum Loan Amount = $417,000

No Cash Reserves Required

No Minimum Contribution from the Borrower’s Own Funds Required

No PMI Required: UpFront USDA Guaranteed Fee of 2% can be Financed into the Loan Amount for Purchase Transactions and .5% for Rate/Term Refinances

- Check Eligibility for Income and Property First at http://eligibility.sc.egov.usda.gov

If you are interested in learning more about the different financing programs, please contact us and we can put you in contact with a local lender.

We look forward to helping you move on the path towards homeownership!

Add Features / Types etc.Add ListingsLog in to Blog