Blog

Posts Tagged ‘Financing’

Lawmakers consider home tax credit extension

Friday, June 11th, 2010

WASHINGTON – June 11, 2010 – Homebuyers may get an extra three months to finish qualifying for federal tax incentives that boosted home sales this spring.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Thursday he wants to give buyers until Sept. 30 to complete their purchases and qualify for tax credits of up to $8,000. Under the current terms, buyers had until April 30 to get a signed sales contract and until June 30 to complete the sale.

The proposal would only allow people who already have signed contracts to finish at the later date. The National Association of Realtors estimates that about 180,000 homebuyers who already signed purchase agreements are likely to miss the deadline.

Reid introduced the proposal as an amendment to a bill that would extend jobless benefits through the end of November. Joining him were Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., and Christopher Dodd, D-Conn. The Senate is expected to take up the amendment next week.

The Realtors group has been pushing hard in Congress for the extension. Mortgage lenders, the trade group says, have been swamped with borrowers trying to get approved by the end of the month. Many potential borrowers are unlikely to make the deadline.

“Time is of the essence,” said Lucien Salvant, a spokesman for the group. “It’s important for Congress to get this done, because there’s whole bunch of loans that aren’t going to close on time.”

First-time buyers were eligible for a tax credit of up to $8,000. Current owners who bought and moved into another home could qualify for a credit of up to $6,500.

Help arrives for second mortgages

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

The Obama administration’s initiative to help homeowners obtain modifications of second mortgages is getting off the ground.

Just this month, Bank of America became the first major lender in the program to send letters offering modifications to home-equity loan customers struggling with their loans.

Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo joined the program in March, when updated guidelines were issued by the government.

Those banks hold about half of the USA’s second liens.

The program, originally introduced in August, is aimed at overcoming an impediment to permanent modifications of first mortgages.

Holders of first mortgages have been reluctant to take losses unless the holder of the second-lien mortgage does, too. More borrowers are staying current on their second mortgages, however, which has made those lenders less inclined to take losses.

The government’s second-mortgage program, called 2MP, offers incentives to borrowers, mortgage servicers and investors to modify second mortgages. How it works:

• When a borrower’s first loan is modified under the federal program, known as the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), and the servicer of the second loan is also a participant in HAMP, that servicer must offer to modify the borrower’s second lien.

• Servicers can stretch the term of the second loan to 40 years.

• Second-lien lenders must defer the payment of the same proportion of principal that was deferred or forgiven on the first loan.

The second loans also must have originated on or before Jan. 1, 2009, to be eligible for a modification.

Modifying a mortgage with a second lien can be more difficult because of the additional parties involved.

A second lien may be held by another servicer or investor, and getting all parties to agree on interest rate reductions or other steps to ease borrowers’ monthly payments can be time-consuming or difficult. The government program aims to make the process easier.

The number of homeowners who will get assistance is limited.

While the program is expected to reach up to 1.5 million homeowners who are struggling to afford their mortgage payments, there are an estimated 19 million residential junior liens, with an average balance of $57,000 as of January, according to First American CoreLogic.

Up to 50 percent of at-risk mortgages have second liens, according to the Treasury Department.

Even with the incentives the government is offering mortgage lenders to modify second mortgages, they could still prove to be an obstacle as pressure grows to reduce borrowers’ loan principal.

Copyright © 2010 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc., Stephanie Armour.

Mortgage rates on the rise!

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

The average rate on a 30-year loan has jumped from about 5 percent to more than 5.3 percent in just the past week. As mortgages get more expensive, more would-be homeowners are priced out of the market – a threat to the fragile recovery in the housing market.

And if you wanted to refinance at a super-low rate, you may have missed your chance. Mortgages under 4 percent are still available, but only for loans that reset in five or seven years, probably to higher rates.

Rates are going up because of the improving economy and the end of a government push to make mortgages cheaper.

For people putting their homes on the market this spring, rising rates may actually be a good thing. Buyers are racing to complete their purchases and lock in something decent before rates go even higher.

It’s all about affordability. For every 1-percentage point rise in rates, 300,000 to 400,000 would-be buyers are priced out of the market in a given year, according to the National Association of Realtors.

The rule of thumb is that every 1-percentage point increase in mortgage rates reduces a buyer’s purchasing power by about 10 percent.

For example, taking out a 30-year mortgage for $300,000 at a rate of 5 percent will cost you about $1,600 a month, not including taxes and insurance. But the same monthly payment at a rate of 6 percent will only get you a loan of $270,000.

Good economic news is the first reason rates are rising: U.S. government debt, a safe haven during the recession, is losing its appeal as investors turn to stocks and riskier corporate bonds.

Lower demand for debt means the government has to offer a better interest rate to sell its bonds. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note, which is closely tracked by mortgage rates, hovered above 4 percent this week, the highest since June, before falling back slightly.

The second reason is the Federal Reserve. Last week, the Fed ended its program to push mortgage rates down by buying up mortgage-backed securities. When demand from the central bank was high, rates plummeted to about 4.7 percent for much of last year. And business boomed for mortgage lenders as homeowners raced to refinance out of adjustable-rate mortgages and into fixed loans.

As of Wednesday, the Mortgage Bankers Association put the national average for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at 5.31 percent. One week ago, it was 5.04 percent.

Many analysts forecast rates will rise as high as 6 percent by early next year. If they go much higher, the already shaky housing recovery could stall. And that could slow the broader economic rebound.

In a normal market, with home prices steadily rising, a jump in rates doesn’t cause a big dip in demand. That’s because people know their homes will eventually rise in value, and are willing to accept a higher mortgage payment.

But now home prices are flat nationally and still falling in some places. Potential buyers are nervous about jumping in.

For people who bought their first home in the 1980s, when rates stayed over 10 percent for several years, paying 6 percent for a home loan may seem like a steal. But it’s coming as a shock to many first-time homebuyers this spring.

Copyright © USA TODAY 2010, David J. Lynch. Adrian Sainz reported from Miami.

Do new home-appraisal rules help?

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

More homebuyers will soon find that their mortgage broker can’t select an appraiser, part of a federal effort to ensure that appraisers aren’t pressured to inflate home values.

Effective Feb. 15, mortgage brokers will no longer be able to order appraisals on loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). For consumers, that is supposed to mean home appraisals will more closely reflect a home’s value. The reason: Brokers who may profit from a loan being approved won’t also be choosing appraisers, who may feel pressured to declare a higher value.

But organizations such as the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and the Appraisal Institute say the change, along with other efforts to reform the appraisal industry, is hurting consumers and appraisers. They say new rules that swept through the appraisal industry in 2009 – rules designed to ensure appraisals are impartial – are resulting in excessively low home values, because chosen appraisers aren’t as experienced or as familiar with local markets. They also say the appraisers take more time, causing delays in getting appraisals done.

“The appraisal must be completely independent of the lending side, but there are extensive time delays,” says Joe Ventrone, vice president for regulatory and industry affairs with NAR. “The values that come back are lower. A $300,000 house might come back (appraised) at $200,000.”

A changed business

The changes began in May when Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae adopted a code designed to separate loan officers from the hiring of appraisers. Since Freddie and Fannie account for nine-tenths of new home loan originations, it reshaped the business.

The code means brokers, Realtors and loan-production staff – anyone who stands to earn a commission based on the value of the transaction – can’t hire an appraiser. Instead, lenders are turning to third-party appraisal management companies that typically hire appraisers on contract to do the job.

The Title/Appraisal Vendor Management Association (TAVMA), the trade association of the real estate settlement services industry, says the third-party firms have well-qualified appraisers to do the job. They also say if appraisal values come in low, it’s only because home prices have fallen due to the market.

But some trade groups say that appraisal management companies are providing appraisers – often from outside the market where the house is located – who are less qualified than independent appraisers that brokers and Realtors might choose. The National Association of Realtors says a member survey found almost 70 percent saying appraisal times had risen by more than eight days under the new rules.

Rob Oryl, an independent appraiser in Collingswood, N.J., says he is seeing it happen. “I know a great appraiser with a staff who had been in the business for years who now just works out of his home,” Oryl says. “It’s driving people out.”

© Copyright 2010 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.; Stephanie Armour.

USDA mortgage program runs out of money

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

WASHINGTON – March 31, 2010 – A no-down/low downpayment program for rural areas is running out of operational money, jeopardizing sales in some Fla. areas.

 Last week, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced that funding authority for its popular Rural Housing 502 Single-Family Loan Guarantee program would, according to its notice, “likely be exhausted by the end of April 2010.” Once the funding runs out, the USDA will not issue its conditional commitments to homebuyers “subject to receipt of appropriated funds.”

Officially, new appropriated funds don’t become available until October 2010, but the National Association of Realtors® sent letters to Congressional appropriators urging immediate extension of commitment authority for the program. Other real estate interests, such as the National Association of Builders, have also stepped up pressure on Congress.

In a letter sent to every Florida Congressional lawmaker, Florida Realtors® President Wendell Davis told Senators and Representatives that “worthy homebuyers will be left without access to mortgages” from federal inaction. In the letter, Davis protested the lack of funding for Section 502 rural housing and Congress’ failure to extend the National Flood Insurance Program.

“Homeowners and homebuyers in our state/region are already feeling the impact,” Davis said in his letter. “Given the many challenges financial and real estate markets are facing, now is not the time to create another obstacle to real estate transactions.”

However, Congress is now in recess and does not return until April 12, so additional funding cannot appear until at least then. In addition, an increase in funding is not assured for the rural housing program, and homebuyers counting on the loan could be out of luck – especially those homebuyers hoping to use a USDA loan in time to qualify by the April 30 deadline for the federal tax credit of up to $8,000 for first-time buyers and $6,500 for move-up buyers.

Loans are first-come, first-served. With 1,900 lenders offering the loans, time is of the essence for homebuyers who plan to use the funding. When the money runs out, the program stops operations.

Questions should be directed to USDA’s Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Division at (202) 720-1452.

Shoring up the FHA: Housing agency tightens underwriting policies

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

LAS VEGAS (MarketWatch) — The Federal Housing Administration said Wednesday that it would raise down-payment requirements, boost its mortgage-insurance premiums and tighten its loan underwriting practices in a bid to strengthen its capital reserves and remain solvent in the face of rising foreclosures and delinquencies.

FHA Commissioner David Stevens said the policy changes announced Wednesday were the latest in a series of measures the agency has taken since September to address increasing risk in the housing markets.

The measures announced Wednesday include the following:

  • An increase in the mortgage-insurance premium. The premium will rise to 2.25% of the loan amount, up from 1.75%. The FHA will seek legislative authority for the hike, which would apply both to the up-front and annual premiums it charges. The FHA does not make loans itself, but provides a government guarantee against default for mortgages issued by approved lenders. The mortgage premium is split between an up-front charge paid at closing and an ongoing annual fee. The new premium rate will go into effect in the spring.
  • A hike in FICO score requirements. New borrowers will now be required to have a minimum FICO credit score of 580 to qualify for FHA’s 3.5% down-payment program. New borrowers with less than a 580 FICO score will be required to put down at least 10%. This change will be posted in the Federal Register in February, and after a notice and comment period, would go into effect in the early summer.
  • A reduction in allowable seller concessions from 6% to 3%. The current level exposes the FHA to excess risk by creating incentives to inflate appraised value, according to Stevens. This change will bring FHA into conformity with industry standards on seller concessions. This change will be posted in the Federal Register in February, and after a notice and comment period, would go into effect in the early summer.
  • Increased enforcement on FHA lenders. The agency will publicly report lender-performance rankings to complement currently available Neighborhood Watch data, which will be available on the HUD Web site starting Feb.1. Stevens said this is an operational change to make information more user-friendly and hold lenders more accountable; it does not require new regulatory action as Neighborhood Watch data is currently publicly available. The agency will also enhance monitoring of lender performance and compliance with FHA guidelines and standards. The changes are effective immediately.
  • A series of proposed additions to FHA legislative authority that would further tighten reins on lenders.

In addition to the changes proposed Wednesday, Stevens said the FHA is continuing to review its overall response to housing-market conditions, as well as continuing to evaluate its mortgage-insurance underwriting standards and its measures to help distressed and underwater borrowers through FHA/HAMP and other FHA initiatives.

Add Features / Types etc.Add ListingsLog in to Blog